W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > August 2003

RE: ORA-FO-ORGANIZATION 14.1.4 fn:number

From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 17:13:06 +0200
Message-ID: <DFF2AC9E3583D511A21F0008C7E62106073DD05B@daemsg02.software-ag.de>
To: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>, Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
I would be inclined to put fn:string() and fn:number() together in a new
section "5.3 Conversion Functions". (Under 5 Constructor Functions). They
are clearly misplaced at the moment.
(Alternative: list all functions alphabetically and abandon all attempts at
logical grouping).
Michael Kay

-----Original Message-----
From: Ashok Malhotra [mailto:ashokma@microsoft.com] 
Sent: 11 August 2003 17:05
To: Stephen Buxton; public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: RE: ORA-FO-ORGANIZATION 14.1.4 fn:number

fn:number is listed under Functions and Operators on Nodes because it used
to take a node as argument.

It now takes item()?.  I don't feel strongly about where it goes but I'm not
sure whether there is a clearly better home for it.

All the best, Ashok 


From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Buxton
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 10:43 AM
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: ORA-FO-ORGANIZATION 14.1.4 fn:number


Functions and Operators, Section 14.1.4 Why is fn:number <fn:number>  listed
in the "Functions and Operators on Nodes" section ?
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2003 11:13:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:13 UTC