RE: MS-FO-LC1-093: fn:item-at

Michael:
As you may remember we discussed the removal of this function at the F&O
meeting in Redmond on 7/18 and the F&O taskforce decided not to
recommend its removal.

All the best, Ashok

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Rys
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 11:58 AM
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: MS-FO-LC1-093: fn:item-at
> 
> 
> Class: Editorial
> 
> Section 15.1.6: We already have the [] notation for indexing
sequences.
> This function is not needed except for defining the semantics of
> [position()=x] (at most). In that case, move this into the formal
> semantics as a function belonging to fs: pseudo-namespace.
>