W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > August 2003

Re: MS-FO-LC1-051: Section 9.1

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 14:00:56 -0700
Message-ID: <E5B814702B65CB4DA51644580E4853FB0A1A8ACF@red-msg-12.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>

Wording fixed.  Thanks!

All the best, Ashok

Original message:

Class: Editorial
				
List does not contain a duration type. Rewrite "The operators described
in this section are defined on the following duration, date and time
types:" to " The operators described in this section are defined on the
following date and time types:"

Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2003 17:01:07 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ashok Malhotra: "RE: MS-FO-LC1-052: 9.1.1 Overflow on duration"
Previous message: Ashok Malhotra: "RE: MS-FO-LC1-096: Section 15.1.7 add more complex examples"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:00 GMT