W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > August 2003

RE: [F&O] fn:reverse missing?

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 05:41:49 -0700
Message-ID: <E5B814702B65CB4DA51644580E4853FB0A1A81B5@red-msg-12.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Noe Michejda" <noe_michejda@7thPortal.pl>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>

Thank you for your comment.  The Functions and Operators task force
agreed to add fn:reverse() as an illustrative function.

All the best, Ashok
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Noe Michejda
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 5:10 PM
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: [F&O] fn:reverse missing?
> 
> 
> Hi
> 
> I think F&O is lacking function for reversing sequence order.
> Something like this would be useful:
> 
> fn:reverse($sourceSeq as item*) as item*
> 
> It can be written as recursive function of course,
> but if there are functions like fn:exist in F&O,
> function like above could be added for clarity
> and possibilily of high optimization.
> 
> --
> Noe Michejda
> 7thPortal
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 1 August 2003 08:42:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:13 UTC