RE: XSLT 15th Nov: unparsed-entity-public-id

I'm sorry that this one got overlooked in the last round. I've now raised it
as XSLT issue #158. Thanks for raising it again.

Michael Kay

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@nag.co.uk] 
> Sent: 18 November 2002 12:30
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: XSLT 15th Nov: unparsed-entity-public-id
> 
> 
> 
> 
> In a comment on the last draft I queried the result of this 
> function in the case that the entity had no PUBLIC id. In 
> your reply you suggested that the text should have an "issue" 
> and that perhaps () rather than "" should be returned.
> 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2002Aug/0054.html

I think that the text is unchanged in this draft and I don't see a specific
issue in the document.

I do note that the data model document 
http://www.w3.org/TR/query-datamodel/
does state that () is returned for both dm:unparsed-entity-public-id 
and dm:unparsed-entity-system-id  accessors but that doesn't directly
specify the user accessible functions, I believe.


David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.