W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > November 2002

XQuery 1.0 - 2.2 "Collection"

From: Don Chamberlin <chamberl@almaden.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 23:19:04 -0500 (EST)
To: Svgdeveloper@aol.com
Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF6CCF9CF7.F884CC63-ON88256C68.00176090@us.ibm.com>
Andrew,
In my opinion, this passage is reasonably clear as written.
--Don Chamberlin

---------- original message ---------
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:57:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Svgdeveloper@aol.com
Message-ID: <171.15fc62ad.2ae85900@aol.com>
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: XQuery 1.0 - 2.2 "Collection"

The description in 2.2 of the xf:collection function is confusing, to me 
at 
least.

A collection is said to be any sequence of nodes but a sequence is defined 

elsewhere as a collection of both nodes and atomic values. So, by that 
latter 
definition it isn't that kind of sequence at all.

Also it doesn't seem helpful to define a collection by using a term which 
is 
itself defined in terms of an (ordered) collection.

A similar lack of clarity/consistency seems to afflict 14.5.4 in Functions 

and Operators.

Andrew Watt
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 04:38:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:58 GMT