Re: Use Cases 1.4.4 - Inconsistency and Typo from Jonathan Robie on 2002-11-04 (public-qt-comments@w3.org from November 2002)

From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 17:10:51 -0500
To: Svgdeveloper@aol.com, public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021104170756.030bfc28@ncmail.datadirect-technologies.com>

At 07:57 AM 10/21/2002 -0400, Svgdeveloper@aol.com wrote:

>In 1.4.4 it is stated, "The following results assume that the queries were
>executed on Feb. 1,1999.".
>
>However, Q8 relates to sales in March 1999 which would be rather difficult to
>estimate on 1st February 1999.
>
>A similar inconsistency arises with respect to Question 9 which relates to
>several months in 1999 after February.

OK, I'll change the date from Feb 1, 1999 to Jan 1, 2000.

>Is there a typo in the first line of 1.4.4.8 Q8? Should "actioned" read
>"auctioned"?

The term "actioned" is defined as "auction ended" in this text. It's not a 
typo.

Jonathan

Received on Monday, 4 November 2002 17:11:24 UTC