I wonder, according to this listing, the xhtml-rdfa-2.dtd does exist (but it's super slow to respond) http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/ Why shouldn't this DOCTYPE then be used? 2012/11/2 Jaime Iniesta <jaimeiniesta@gmail.com> > I wonder, according to this listing, the xhtml-rdfa-2.dtd does exist (but > it's super slow to respond) > > > > 2012/11/2 Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> > >> On 2.11.2012 20:41, Jaime Iniesta wrote: >> >> > Other URLs are fine, but all within this site are super slow. It does >> not >> > seem a connectivity issue, as I can browse this site fine, ping, etc. >> >> It might be that XML parsers is trying to fetch DTD you are referring >> from DOCTYPE: >> >> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-2.dtd >> >> Just use <!DOCTYPE html> as a doctype and replace all entity refernces >> like with appropriate Unicode character and you should be fine. >> >> Jirka >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Professional XML consulting and training services >> DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> > > > -- > Jaime Iniesta :: Ruby on Rails consultant > http://jaimeiniesta.com > http://prorubyteam.com > > -- Jaime Iniesta :: Ruby on Rails consultant http://jaimeiniesta.com http://prorubyteam.comReceived on Friday, 2 November 2012 22:32:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 2 November 2012 22:32:34 GMT