W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qa-dev@w3.org > October 2009

Re: Initial remarks on Unicorn

From: Jean-Guilhem Rouel <jean-gui@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:28:49 +0200
Message-ID: <4ACCC1C1.1060408@w3.org>
To: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
CC: public-qa-dev@w3.org
Le 07/10/2009 16:45, Steven Pemberton a écrit :
> Do you content negotiate? I went to some pages that I *thought* content 
> negotiated betwen HTML and XHTML, but your validator only seemed to look 
> at the HTML version.

Do you have a URI handy? I think the behavior depends on each 

>>> 4. Please include a "try again" button, so that you can do edit - 
>>> validate - edit - validate cycles easily.
>> Besides the fact that this button wouldn't be able to check resources 
>> first submitted by file upload, I'm not sure to see the point here as 
>> browsers can already refresh pages.
> That's because you know that refreshing the page does a revalidation. 
> Most users won't be aware of that...

Interesting. I'll add that on the TODO list.

>>> 6. .intro    Property  margin doesn't exist : 0 0 0 0
>>>     .intro {width: 60%; border: thin black solid; background-color: 
>>> #ccf; float: left; margin: 0 0 0 0}
>>>     What's wrong with 'margin'?
>> I couldn't reproduce this, can you give us the URI to Unicorn's results?
> http://qa-dev.w3.org/unicorn/observe?ucn_uri=www.internetguideto.com%2Flondon&ucn_lang=en&ucn_task=conformance# 

This error is reported by the CSS validator: 

It seems to be because the space before the word margin is not a regular 
one (perhaps it is a non-breaking space).

> By the way, I now see that it says "This document has passed the test: 
> W3C HTML Validator" even though it has two errors, and the bar is 
> coloured red.

Thomas fixed it a moment ago.


> Best wishes,
> Steven
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2009 16:29:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:36:28 UTC