On Feb 8, 2008, at 01:09 , Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > The main obstacle is that the mobileOK checker has a set of well- > defined > HTTP headers (User-Agent, Accept and Accept-Charset [3]), and many > mobile sites rely on these parameters to send an appropriate response > back. OK, the Accept-Charset option is now in CVS and documented. > 3. http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK-basic10-tests/#http_request On the topic of the MWBP's HTTP Accept headers, have you seen this? http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/01/are_you_mobileok.html#c104825 etc. I still disagree with Laurens, but you may want to bring that to the WG's attention. -- olivierReceived on Wednesday, 13 February 2008 05:58:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 13 February 2008 05:58:47 GMT