Re: mod_perl memory usage

On Thursday 02 August 2007, Gerald Oskoboiny wrote:
>
> Also, 'check' is so expensive that I didn't really expect
> mod_perl to be a huge win; the bit of extra work to fire up a
> perl interpreter must be relatively cheap.

You're probably right, however at least the httpd.conf snippets in CVS make 
the validator run with ModPerl::Registry which does a bunch of other things 
in addition to setting up a preloaded, shared perl interpreter.  IIRC 
ModPerl::PerlRun does the shared interpreter (+ some precompiled shared 
standard perl modules?) part only and could also be worth a try.