- From: Sierk Bornemann <sierkb@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:09:15 +0100
- To: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Cc: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
At 14:37 15.11.2006, you wrote: >For instance >http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/validator/misc/docs_errors.pl >has the last file in the 0.7 branch properly tagged validator-0_7_4- >release, and the file in HEAD (so outside of the 0.7 branch) modified >later, is not tagged anything else than HEAD. I trust this is the >case of all files modified after the packages were made, online >instances updated and announcement sent. > >Maybe you were a bit early in cvs-get'ing the tagged files? I have taken a CVS snapshot this early morning/night from validator-0_7-branch, just right after the last CVS messages reached me by mail, you said per mail, that all is done and the website was updated. So, I thought, no more files will be changed concerning 0.7.4. As I watched my mail this morning, 2 CVS mails reached me documenting changes to validator-0_7_4-release. So I did update my 3 validator checkouts: validator (HEAD), validator-0_7-branch and validator-0_7_4-release. As far as I remember, while I was checking out this noon, I watched the following: validator-0_7-branch didn't change, validator-0_7_4-release changed, validator (HEAD) changed. Because validator-0_7-branch, which I have taken for packaging this early morning/night didn't change, I have come to the conclusion, that sticking to the branch will be the best, because -release and HEAD could be merged hours later and the branch is the first of all, which is up-to-date. Sierk Sierk Bornemann | Hannover | Germany ICQ: 221105136 e-mail: sierkb@gmx.de URL: http://sierkbornemann.de/
Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2006 15:56:22 UTC