- From: Jean-Guilhem Rouel <ze.reaper@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:17:09 +0200
- To: "olivier Thereaux" <ot@w3.org>
- Cc: "QA Dev" <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
On 7/6/06, olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org> wrote: > > On Jul 4, 2006, at 17:07 , Jean-Guilhem Rouel wrote: > > I think there is a problem with the "Unicorn output" : there should be > > an enclosing error/warning/miscmessage tag for each > > error/warning/miscmessage produced in the output_message_xml function. > > Indeed, good catch. > > One thing I noticed when doing this patch: what was your rationale > for the usage of <miscmessages> (etc.)? I would have probably reused > <informations> (and infocount, infolist, info), as used at least in > the Feed validator. > > http://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/soap The only reason is that we didn't know this validator, so we had to find a name, miscmessage was the first coming to our minds. If you want, we can change this. > Generally speaking, since the unicorn response format is coming after > the ones used in markup, css and feed validation services, two (and a > half) of which are in production, we should try and keep as close as > possible to these. > > -- > olivier > > >
Received on Thursday, 6 July 2006 08:17:20 UTC