Re: [PATCH] appendix C checker

On Jul 4, 2006, at 17:07 , Jean-Guilhem Rouel wrote:
> I think there is a problem with the "Unicorn output" : there should be
> an enclosing error/warning/miscmessage tag for each
> error/warning/miscmessage produced in the output_message_xml function.

Indeed, good catch.

One thing I noticed when doing this patch: what was your rationale  
for the usage of <miscmessages> (etc.)? I would have probably reused  
<informations> (and infocount, infolist, info), as used at least in  
the Feed validator.

http://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/soap

Generally speaking, since the unicorn response format is coming after  
the ones used in markup, css and feed validation services, two (and a  
half) of which are in production, we should try and keep as close as  
possible to these.

-- 
olivier