W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qa-dev@w3.org > July 2006

Re: [PATCH] appendix C checker

From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:01:00 +0900
Message-Id: <943BBF99-3463-407A-89AD-65A20CB7F886@w3.org>
Cc: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
To: Jean-Guilhem Rouel <ze.reaper@gmail.com>


On Jul 4, 2006, at 17:07 , Jean-Guilhem Rouel wrote:
> I think there is a problem with the "Unicorn output" : there should be
> an enclosing error/warning/miscmessage tag for each
> error/warning/miscmessage produced in the output_message_xml function.

Indeed, good catch.

One thing I noticed when doing this patch: what was your rationale  
for the usage of <miscmessages> (etc.)? I would have probably reused  
<informations> (and infocount, infolist, info), as used at least in  
the Feed validator.

http://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/soap

Generally speaking, since the unicorn response format is coming after  
the ones used in markup, css and feed validation services, two (and a  
half) of which are in production, we should try and keep as close as  
possible to these.

-- 
olivier
Received on Thursday, 6 July 2006 06:01:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 19 August 2010 18:12:46 GMT