- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:56:55 +0900
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Hi Karl, On Nov 1, 2005, at 5:37, Karl Dubost wrote: > It might not be an emergency and it's just a question which popped up > in my mind. I guess there will be a time when people will ask about > "WSDL for W3C validators". > * Is it difficult to put in place? Not difficult. We have a WSDL file for the CSS validator already, but it's WSDL2, which is not yet a REC, so we asked Hugo if he could transform it into 1.1. Once we have that making an equivalent for the others is straightforward. > * Burdensome? > * Useful? Why? We'll need human readable doc for the SOAP interfaces anyway (cruelly lacking, but I am working on it), so maybe a little burdensome to hav eboth, but having a clear, clean description of the service (and in particular of the response format) would be very useful, I believe. -- olivier
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2005 00:57:03 UTC