- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:16:37 +0200
- To: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi> wrote: >Yep... but let's get a decision whether we want to support running >validator 0.8+ _without_ some version of mod_perl, first, ok? :) I don't want to drop support for running as a plain CGI just yet. But as Björn points out, making optimizations for running as CGI are probably not a good idea; or, contrariwise, such optimizations might well be made but then should probably be unconditional. >Support for running without mod_perl means keeping stuff so generic >anyway that I think the m_p 1 vs 2 vs both question is moot. Do we see any clear wins in moving to a more “native” mod_perl API? i.e. does dropping CGI support — the generic API that moots mod_perl 1 vs. 2 — actually gain us anything? -- "The woods are lovely, dark, and deep; But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep; And miles to go before I sleep..." -- Robert Frost, "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening"
Received on Thursday, 18 August 2005 19:16:42 UTC