W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qa-dev@w3.org > September 2004

S:P:O in cvs is win32-specific?

From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:35:42 +0900
Message-Id: <85DBA0E6-00A0-11D9-AF78-000393A80896@w3.org>
To: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
tried to buid SPO from sourceforge's CVS. Relevant output:

07/09 16:16 ot@wasabi /usr/local/perl/modules/spo% perl Makefile.PL
Checking if your kit is complete...
Looks good
Note (probably harmless): No library found for 
-lD:\osp\lib\Release\osp152.lib
Writing Makefile for SGML::Parser::OpenSP


07/09 16:18 ot@wasabi /usr/local/perl/modules/spo% make
cl -TP -EHsc -ID:/osp/ -c   -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE 
-DTHREADS_HAVE_PIDS -DDEBIAN -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include 
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2   -DVERSION=\"0.02\" 
-DXS_VERSION=\"0.02\" -fPIC "-I/usr/lib/perl/5.8/CORE"  
-DSP_MULTI_BYTE=1 OpenSP.c
/bin/sh: cl: command not found
make: *** [OpenSP.o] Error 127

cl as in the windows C compiler? Just a guess, - "cl" is not an easy 
thing to google - but that and the lD with backslashes seem to point in 
the same direction.

So... Is SPO win32 only on purpose, is my makemaker (or its user) 
stupid, or...?

I can probably hack the Makefile, though, just wanted to know if it's a 
problem on my side or not.

-- 
olivier

Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2004 07:35:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 19 August 2010 18:12:44 GMT