- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 15:27:59 +0200
- To: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Cc: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
* Terje Bless wrote: >cf. the minutes from the last meeting; I've set up a tracking bug[0] for open >issues for the 0.7.0 release. > > [0] — <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=856> > >Existing bugs relevant to 0.7 have been added as blocker on this bug, and I'm >filing new TODO/MUSTFIX stuff with blockers on it as well. To nominate any >other stuff (new or old) for fixing in 0.7, add a blocker on that bug. > >Not everything that's there will necessarily make it for 0.7; and if there is >anything in particular that you want to nuke then make a comment to that >effect on Bug #856. I can't really figure out from #856 or your mail what *needs* to be done to make the current code in HEAD as "good" as 0.6.7 in order to release it. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qa-dev/2004Jul/0012.html reads: [...] 1 merging current code with HEAD -> HEAD 2 Terje lists issues remaining after the merge 3 fixing the resulting HEAD 4 releasing HEAD [...] When I proposed these steps, I thought of the remaining issues as those that turn the Validator in a state *worse than 0.6.7* not as those that are present in both the HEAD of that time and 0.6.7; #856 however lists many things of the latter kind, so maybe I did not communicate this well enough? What needs to be done to put HEAD into a state that is at least as good as 0.6.7?
Received on Saturday, 4 September 2004 13:28:45 UTC