W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qa-dev@w3.org > September 2004

Re: [wmvs] Open Issues for 0.7.0

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 15:27:59 +0200
To: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
Cc: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <413fb30c.52020561@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Terje Bless wrote:
>cf. the minutes from the last meeting; I've set up a tracking bug[0] for open
>issues for the 0.7.0 release.
>
>  [0] — <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=856>
>
>Existing bugs relevant to 0.7 have been added as blocker on this bug, and I'm
>filing new TODO/MUSTFIX stuff with blockers on it as well. To nominate any
>other stuff (new or old) for fixing in 0.7, add a blocker on that bug.
>
>Not everything that's there will necessarily make it for 0.7; and if there is
>anything in particular that you want to nuke then make a comment to that
>effect on Bug #856.

I can't really figure out from #856 or your mail what *needs* to be done
to make the current code in HEAD as "good" as 0.6.7 in order to release
it. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qa-dev/2004Jul/0012.html
reads:

[...]
  1 merging current code with HEAD -> HEAD
  2 Terje lists issues remaining after the merge
  3 fixing the resulting HEAD
  4 releasing HEAD
[...]

When I proposed these steps, I thought of the remaining issues as those
that turn the Validator in a state *worse than 0.6.7* not as those that
are present in both the HEAD of that time and 0.6.7; #856 however lists
many things of the latter kind, so maybe I did not communicate this well
enough? What needs to be done to put HEAD into a state that is at least
as good as 0.6.7?
Received on Saturday, 4 September 2004 13:28:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 19 August 2010 18:12:44 GMT