- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 10:56:44 +0200
- To: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org> wrote: >Since we're going for at least two other maintenance releases, I'd like >confirmation of my understanding of our CVS state... > > - HEAD is 0.6.5 plus templates code > - 0_6-branch is 0.6.5 plus fixes > >If so, I suppose we are going to merge again after 0.6.6 and work on >0.6.7 in the branch, etc. Correct; that's what I'm thinking. >Would that mean by any chance that we're already in a scheme similar to >the one explained in ><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qa-dev/2004Apr/0030.html>? Yes. With a couple of caveats... The merge to HEAD is not complete. While all the code has been brought over from the validator-0_6_0-branch, not all the resulting breakage has been fixed yet. And I don't expect anyone has been testing this code much yet (at least, nobody has sent me notes about the things I know of that are broken). Also, I'm not entirely certain whether we should immediately branch+feature-freeze HEAD->0.7 yet; or whether squeezing in a few more features on HEAD first would be a good idea. I'm still too focussed on 0.6.x for this to have really gelled in my mind yet. Opinions? >>Hey, lets see if we can get in 3 new Validator versions during WWW2004? >>:-) > >*cough*. How about "no"...? :) Bah! Spoilsport! How about two then? 0.6.6 ASAP, and 0.6.7 on the 22nd? :-) - -- We've gotten to the point where a human-readable, human-editable text format for structured data has become a complex nightmare where somebody can safely say "As many threads on xml-dev have shown, text-based processing of XML is hazardous at best" and be perfectly valid in saying it. -- Tom Bradford -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 iQA/AwUBQKxyyqPyPrIkdfXsEQLigQCg+dKDmp+dBzd4HOK4c3P9u31pM0AAoL++ Bxeb0b1Pi2VE8sntvXG/yU3U =9rl9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 20 May 2004 04:58:59 UTC