W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qa-dev@w3.org > July 2004

Re: [checklink] recursion fix (was: perl/modules/W3C/LinkChecker/bin checklink,4.1,4.2)

From: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:34:46 +0300
To: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
Cc: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1090265686.17058.23.camel@bobcat.mine.nu>

On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 10:05, olivier Thereaux wrote:

> Apparently the "test case" is not relevant any more because the author 
> fixed his links...  In 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2004Jun/0184.html you 
> say you had another test case, I trust you successfully tested the new 
> code against it.

Yep.  Here's the test case:
http://qa-dev.w3.org/~ville/recursion-skip-bug/
http://validator.w3.org/checklink?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fqa-dev.w3.org%2F%7Eville%2Frecursion-skip-bug%2F&recursive=on
http://qa-dev.w3.org/wlc/checklink?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fqa-dev.w3.org%2F%7Eville%2Frecursion-skip-bug%2F&recursive=on

> Should we, then, choose a date for the release of TNV? How about next 
> week, if you think all is ready? Or do you think another round of tests 
> is necessary?

I think it's ready, as the fix was pretty trivial.  I'll roll a release
tarball tomorrow before the meeting.
Received on Monday, 19 July 2004 15:34:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 19 August 2010 18:12:44 GMT