W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qa-dev@w3.org > January 2004

Re: Problem with SSI in Beta version

From: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 00:08:08 +0200
To: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1074463687.31628.114.camel@bobcat.mine.nu>

On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 23:47, Terje Bless wrote:

> >Any idea which is best for caching? I thought XBitHack Full was the best
> >config for that, but I may be wrong.
> 
> XBitHack is intended to preserve cacheability, yes.

Uhh, XBitHack is even more a hack than I imagined.  Never bothered to
RTFM on it before now.

>  But we can probably
> combine it with AddHandler unless Apache is designed to let one kill the
> other. Anyone know?

Dunno.  Maybe it's best just to stick with the current config and do the
chmod in the CVS repo after all.
Received on Sunday, 18 January 2004 17:08:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 19 August 2010 18:12:43 GMT