W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qa-dev@w3.org > September 2003

Re: [check] RPM nitpicks...

From: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 21:26:25 +0300
To: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1063391184.14087.22.camel@bobcat.mine.nu>

On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 18:55, Terje Bless wrote:

> warning: docbook-dtds-1.0-22.1.noarch.rpm: \
>   V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID e418e3aa
> warning: docbook-style-dsssl-1.78-2.noarch.rpm: \
>   V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 897da07a
> warning: perl-Config-General-2.21-0.fdr.1.noarch.rpm: \
>   V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID bcd241cb

Recent versions of rpm complain if you haven't imported the keys that
the to-be-installed packages are signed with.  The keys:

bcd241cb: My key.
897da07a: The old Red Hat Rawhide key.
e418e3aa: The new (2003) Red Hat Rawhide key.

See http://cachalot.mine.nu/9/#key for more info.

> Failed to remove entry from /etc/sgml/sgml-docbook-3.0-1.0-17.cat
> Failed to remove entry from /etc/sgml/sgml-docbook-3.1-1.0-17.cat
> Failed to remove entry from /etc/sgml/sgml-docbook-4.0-1.0-17.cat
> Failed to remove entry from /etc/sgml/sgml-docbook-4.1-1.0-17.cat
> Failed to remove entry from /etc/sgml/xml-docbook-4.1.2-1.0-17.cat
> Failed to remove entry from /etc/sgml/sgml-docbook-4.2-1.0-17.cat
> Failed to remove entry from /etc/sgml/xml-docbook-4.2-1.0-17.cat

These, on the other hand look like packaging bugs in the Rawhide (or
RHL9) docbook-dtds package.  I haven't rebuilt them at all, just
downloaded from Rawhide to my repository (as witnessed by the RH
signature).  This is part of the pain of getting a sane OpenSP 1.5 (or
openjade 1.3.2 in RH's case) installed on RHL 9.
Received on Friday, 12 September 2003 14:26:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 19 August 2010 18:12:43 GMT