W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qa-dev@w3.org > October 2002

Re: [check] Status and Progress

From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:28:14 +0200
To: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <a01060005-1021-B8A6ABDEE6D611D6AC5400039300CF5C@[193.157.66.10]>

Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> wrote:

>>That's probably more then enough to completely destabilize the code for
>>a good clip so if anyone thinks we ought be a bit more carefull now is
>>the time to holler before I go wild. :-)
>
>Is there a way to pull out piece by piece? or is it better to restart
>from scratch. If it's the second solution is it better to create a new
>CVS tree to maintain it?

I think perhaps restructuring CVS may be a good idea in any case. The
current CVS reflects a "dump" of a server layout that hasn't been relevant
for some time now (in particular, the httpd.conf is way out of sync with
reality), and I know Ville has some good ideas in this area.

It's not really necessary of course; there is no reason why we couldn't
just keep going in current CVS on a branch.

-- 
These are the same customers you are referring to whom Microsoft thought
would need MS Bob and the Talking Paperclip?   One thing is to give them
enough rope to hang themselves,  but a boobytrapped thermonuclear weapon
running on a rand(time) countdown... Is that really wise? - Me to MS rep.
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2002 18:28:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 19 August 2010 18:12:43 GMT