RE: meetings minutes

Hi all,

Thank you for remembering both my criticism and my contributions to the CEPC rewrite, but I'd like to emphasize that:

  1.  I did express an emphatic disapproval of the existing CEPC last November, and that was primarily the reason why I wrote the new draft (following the principle "criticize and contribute, not just criticize!");
  2.  My initial draft has been subjected to a wide group review and many revisions (eight revisions to be exact), where both the group co-chairs and the group members contributed their edits and ideas. The latest draft has all the revision history captured in it, and I believe we got it to a point where we all felt good about it and agreed that the legal review would be the appropriate next step.
  3.  It is my (maybe wrong) perception that the newly formed PWECG has no intention to resume the work we conducted last year - I tried to get a clear answer on my questions related to the status of the draft we produced, but got nothing. If the newly formed CG does intend to simply restart the activity and ignore everything we have already done in the past (meaning that the work we conducted produced nothing but hot air) - I am not so sure I see an incentive to continue as a contributor, I cannot afford wasting time and effort on something we've already discussed and, at least at that time, were happy with the results.
  4.  I did send my regrets.

Cheers,
Vlad

P.S. I do think it is a very worthwhile effort to resurrect the draft we created and see what, if anything, is left to be improved. We've come a long way from the very first version of it to the final revision, and in the process of doing it we discovered that the new draft was very much in line with the Code and policies other organizations have in place, both in wording and in spirit.


From: Siegman, Tzviya <tsiegman@wiley.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 1:39 PM
To: public-pwe@w3.org
Subject: meetings minutes

Thanks for attending and thanks to Dave for scribing

https://www.w3.org/2018/10/11-pwe-minutes.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_2018_10_11-2Dpwe-2Dminutes.html&d=DwMFAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=Sc-ry7Q3xvBnomEBkMoE2_ivmrUn9t3iPURPqMYwR3mRAaAfoxAAQdIUO6oCmSDQ&m=GYizUYMBAXQiAjWGi8GtfPBJWoysidvLJLZHLkxIkxQ&s=kEAOZnIhgO3dKliMkgLCfSp05bM61vy3VXD22Zr2N_M&e=>

Tzviya Siegman
Information Standards Lead
Wiley
201-748-6884
tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>




________________________________

This email has been scanned for spam and viruses. Click here<https://us-spambrella.cloud-protect.net/index01.php?mod_id=11&mod_option=logitem&mail_id=1539279592-vnkTa93GHc35&r_address=vladimir.levantovsky%40monotype.com&report=1> to report this email as spam.