W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pubrules-comments@w3.org > April 2015

Re: Testing MathML spec on https://labs.w3.org/pubrules

From: Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 10:10:17 +0800
Message-ID: <551DF689.7070808@w3.org>
To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, public-pubrules-comments@w3.org
On 04/02/2015 04:59 PM, David Carlisle wrote:
>>> * headers.dl says Latest Version missing
>>> as previously agreed, the spec has two latest version links
>>> Latest MathML 3 version:
>>> Latest MathML Recommendation:
>> This is an exception. Pubrules is actually looking for the text "Latest
>> Version":
>> https://github.com/w3c/specberus/blob/master/lib/rules/headers/dl.js
>> We aren't sure yet how to handle these exceptions because it's really on
>> a specification basis.
> It seems quite common for specs that have been through many versions to
> want to do something like this. Check for 'Latest.*[Vv]ersion'  ?

It's fine to have multiple "Latest.*version" urls but if that's the 
case, the checker needs to identify one url (in this case "Latest 
version") as a reference.

>>> * headers.translations says we should use
>>> http://www.w3.org/2003/03/Translations/byTechnology?technology=MathML3
>>> rather than
>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/11/Translations/Query?titleMatch=MathML3
>>> (I can change it if that information is correct, just asking:-)
>> That's just a warning because you are not using the recommended text but
>> it won't be a problem for echidna. It will not pass echidna if there's
>> an error. Warnings are fine.
>> <https://github.com/w3c/specberus/blob/master/lib/rules/headers/translations.js>
> It's good for me (if not for echidna) not to see warnings:-)
> If the 2003 URI is preferable to the 2005 one I'll change the
> drafts to use that (the pages seem to be the same and at the present
> time there are no translations) Or is the 2005/11 URI in fact newer
> and a good link to use, and the test should not be warning?

These 2 pages are actually the same. Since pubrules doesn't enforce the 
2003 URI, I added another issue to specberus so it can also handle the 
2005 URI :)

>>> * sotd.mailing-list says no mailing list link
>>> the SOTD has a mailto: link and links to the www-math list archives and
>>> to the list subscription page?
>> Pubrules is looking for a text content matching the mailing list like:
>> <a href="mailto:www-math@w3.org">www-math@w3.org</a>.
>> <https://github.com/w3c/specberus/blob/master/lib/rules/sotd/mailing-list.js>
>> It seems like a bug as there are no requirements for that. I've created
>> an issue and we'll work on it.
>> https://github.com/w3c/specberus/issues/174
> OK thanks

The issue is now closed. The fix will be deployed very soon.

Thanks again for your feedback.

Received on Friday, 3 April 2015 02:10:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 April 2015 02:10:23 UTC