Re: Charter Change should not be avoided if needed

+1 to Makoto. The committee should be renamed to coordination committee. Steering committee gives a different signal.

And one fundamental question.
Bill M. informed us that according to W3C and IDPF combination documents, we need to continue with elected steering committee for 2 years after the combination.
This is what we are struggling with. There are members of group that feel that coordination committee is better way forward, but it is a challenge to balance both.
How election based steering committee can have all the leads of groups related to publishing. Or will the coordination committee coexist with election based steering committee or are we looking for some other work around?

With regards
Avneesh
From: MURATA Makoto 
Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 08:04
To: public-publishingbg@w3.org 
Subject: Re: Charter Change should not be avoided if needed

I would like to replace a SC by a coordination meeting
among chairs. (Note: This is what working groups around 
XML did.)

I also think that taskforces will help a lot. For example, people
in the current steering committee are not necessarily concerned
about ISO/IEC standardization of EPUB.  Taskforce meetings  
dedicated to it will help a lot. 

Coordination meetings and taskforce meetings should have 
equal status.  They merely provide inputs to the Publishing BG.

Regards,
Makoto