- From: MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 17:57:47 +0900
- To: "McCloy-Kelley, Liisa" <lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com>
- Cc: W3C Publishing Business Group <public-publishingbg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALvn5EAYxWUa3XjsXBQfoqt08FRf50UoAshSXBtvOP20LgXQTQ@mail.gmail.com>
The DRM NWIP ballot succeeded. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2018Aug/0565.html Regards, Makoto (liaison from SC34 to W3C) 2018年8月30日(木) 0:10 MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>: > Liisa, > > The result of the recent New Work Item Proposal ballot for > EPUB DRM has not been announced yet. If the result is > positive, a new project for creating a Technical Specification > will start. > > In my understanding, W3C (including Publishing@W3C) > is reluctant to standardize further DRM specifications. > > 22424-1 and -2 are being balloted again. > > 22424-1 and -2 are based on Open archival information system > (OAIS) (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Archival_Information_System > .) > OAIS is for long-term preservation (e.g., 100 years). > Since I do not know OAIS well, 22424-1 and -2 are beyond > me. > > Some recent SC34 and JWG7 documents can be found at: > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2018Aug/ > > If EPUB provides an infrastructure of digital documents, > it is not surprising to see many projects around EPUB > in many standardization organizations. > > Regards, > Makoto > > 2018年8月29日(水) 22:51 McCloy-Kelley, Liisa < > lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com>: > >> Makoto- >> >> >> >> We missed you very much on the call and hope that you will feel better >> soon! >> >> >> >> Thanks so much for sending us this update. It is very helpful to know >> where we stand on EPUB 3.0.1 and the fast track process and Japan’s efforts >> around EPUB A11Y 1.0. >> >> >> >> Are you aware of the current work within the ISO world relative to: >> >> - JTC 1/SC 34 and the group to develop a standard protocol for a DRM >> wrapper for EPUB >> - PDTS ISO/IEC 2244-2 EPUB Preservation – Part 2 >> >> >> >> Do you have thoughts about either of these or feel that we as the PBG >> should discuss them relative to our own work? >> >> >> >> Part of our discussion last night was about the fact that we would >> generally like to have clean lines of coordination and discussion of ISO >> work that is relative to EPUB. We’d love for you to weigh in on any >> thoughts of how we might do that. >> >> >> >> Best, >> >> >> >> Liisa >> >> >> >> >> >> *From: *MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp> >> *Date: *Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 7:05 AM >> *To: *W3C Publishing Business Group <public-publishingbg@w3.org> >> *Subject: *ISO/IEC standardization of EPUB 3.0.1 and EPUB A11Y 1.0 >> *Resent-From: *<public-publishingbg@w3.org> >> *Resent-Date: *Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 7:04 AM >> >> >> >> Dear colleagues, >> >> >> >> I am very sorry for missing the last teleconference of the PBG. >> >> I was sick and was thus unable to stay awake. Let me report >> >> the current status of the ISO/IEC standardization of EPUB 3.0.1 >> >> and EPUB A11Y 1.0. >> >> >> >> 1. Decisions of the PBG meeting >> >> >> >> In the PBG meeting on April 24 [1], we adopted the recommendation >> >> of a task force for creating ISO/IEC specifications for EPUB 3.X >> >> and EPUB A11Y. The recommendation is basically >> >> ISO/IEC standardization of EPUB 3.0.1 and EPUB Accessibility 1.0. >> >> >> >> [1] https://w3c.github.io/publ-bg/Meetings/Minutes/2018/2018-04-24-pbg >> >> >> >> 2. EPUB 3.0.1 >> >> >> >> To publish EPUB 3.0.1 as International Standards, the PBG sent two >> >> liaison statements. Daniel Dardailler (W3C Director of International >> >> Relations) does not see any problems with these liaison statements. >> >> >> >> In the first liaison statement [2], we asked SC34/JWG7 not to publish >> >> 3.0.1 as Technical Specifications. In the second liaison statement >> >> [3], we asked Korea to submit 3.0.1 as DISs by the fast-track >> >> procedure. >> >> >> >> I heard from Yong-Sang Cho of Korea that Korean NB submitted EPUB >> >> 3.0.1 via the fast-track procedure on August 6. Voting is expected to >> >> start soon. >> >> >> >> [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2018Aug/0472.html >> >> [3] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2018Aug/0539.html >> >> >> >> 3. EPUB A11Y 1.0 >> >> >> >> To publish EPUB Accessibility 1.0 as an International Standard, Japan >> >> prepared a draft of a new work item proposal [4]. Japan requested >> >> SC34/JWG7 to discuss this proposal in the upcoming SC34/JWG7 meeting >> >> on September 12. Japan plans to officially submit this proposal and >> >> start a ballot after the meeting. >> >> >> >> Daniel Dardailler confirmed that W3C has no issue with this >> >> transposition, although he did suggest another possibility: creating a >> >> W3C recommendation for EPUB A11Y first and then sending it to JTC1 via >> >> the PAS procedure. Members of the task force (mentioned above) think >> >> that his suggestion is a very useful input for the standardization >> >> of EPUB A11Y 1.1 (not 1.0) and beyond. >> >> >> >> [4] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2018Aug/0537.html >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Makoto >> >> >> > > > -- > > Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake > > Makoto > -- Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake Makoto
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2018 08:58:20 UTC