RE: PING questionnaire and privacy/security section

I expect for the pub manifest we mostly punt the issues down to specific implementations, but no harm in making that explicit. We could mention that the security considerations for json-ld documents apply, though.[1]

 

Might not warrant more than a single “Security and Privacy Considerations” section.

 

[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11/#iana-considerations

 

Matt

 

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> 
Sent: September 2, 2019 11:05
To: Wendy Reid <wendy.reid@rakuten.com>
Cc: Brady Duga <duga@google.com>; W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: PING questionnaire and privacy/security section

 

We should have the same sections in the Pub Manifest spec even if the content is just a one-liner…

 

Ivan





On 2 Sep 2019, at 15:59, Reid, Wendy <wendy.reid@rakuten.com <mailto:wendy.reid@rakuten.com> > wrote:

 

There are those sections in Audiobooks but they are currently blank.

 

Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef> 

  _____  

From: Brady Duga <duga@google.com <mailto:duga@google.com> >
Sent: Sunday, September 1, 2019 5:12:32 PM
To: W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org <mailto:public-publ-wg@w3.org> >
Subject: PING questionnaire and privacy/security section 

 

I have a feeling the answer to question 2.15 may trip us up: Does this specification have a "Security Considerations" and "Privacy Considerations" section?

 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704

 

Received on Monday, 2 September 2019 16:22:46 UTC