Re: Minimal WPUB for a scholarly paper (of sort)

Heh, our mails crossed! Except that you do not have to use JSON-LD 1.1 for that, 

https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-json-ld-20140116/#default-vocabulary <https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-json-ld-20140116/#default-vocabulary>

has the same example!

Ivan

> On 4 Jun 2018, at 17:02, Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org <mailto:laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>> wrote:
> 
> I also found in https://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#advanced-concepts <https://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#advanced-concepts> another potential solution:
> 
> {
>   "@context": {
>      "@vocab": "http://schema.org/ <http://schema.org/>",
>      "databaseId": null
>   },
>   "@id": "http://example.org/places#BrewEats <http://example.org/places#BrewEats>",
>   "@type": "Restaurant",
>   "name": "Brew Eats",
>   "databaseId": "23987520"
> }
> 
> in 
> Cordialement, 
> 
> Laurent Le Meur
> EDRLab
> 
> 
>> Le 4 juin 2018 à 16:44, Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org <mailto:laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>> a écrit :
>> 
>> Is Google so weak? Can't believe it...
>> 
>> L
>> 
>> 
>>> Le 4 juin 2018 à 16:42, Hadrien Gardeur <hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com <mailto:hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com>> a écrit :
>>> 
>>> This was an option that I pointed out as well during the meeting. Given the fact that we'll need terms from bib.schema.org <http://bib.schema.org/> as well (and probably other vocabularies as well), this feels like a good approach.
>>> 
>>> The main issue with rolling our own context seems to be that Google wouldn't be able to properly parse and index these metadata.
>> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>