ok, and using multiple contexts from JSON-LD 1.1 (https://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#advanced-context-usage <https://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#advanced-context-usage>)? Would Google be happy? L > Le 4 juin 2018 à 16:44, Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org> a écrit : > > Is Google so weak? Can't believe it... > > L > > >> Le 4 juin 2018 à 16:42, Hadrien Gardeur <hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com <mailto:hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com>> a écrit : >> >> This was an option that I pointed out as well during the meeting. Given the fact that we'll need terms from bib.schema.org <http://bib.schema.org/> as well (and probably other vocabularies as well), this feels like a good approach. >> >> The main issue with rolling our own context seems to be that Google wouldn't be able to properly parse and index these metadata. >
Received on Monday, 4 June 2018 14:59:01 UTC