Not at all. How about just a single PDF - ECMA-376 4th edition Part 2<http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/ECMA-376,%20Fourth%20Edition,%20Part%202%20-%20Open%20Packaging%20Conventions.zip>? Leonard From: Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org> Date: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 at 12:09 PM To: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> Cc: Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com>, Brady Duga <duga@google.com>, Garth Conboy <garth@google.com>, Wendy Reid <wendy.reid@rakuten.com>, W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org> Subject: Re: OCF for Packaging (was Re: [AudioTF] Agenda 2018-12-14) Leonard, do really want us to reference a 163 page document (http://web.mit.edu/~stevenj/www/ECMA-376-new-merged.pdf<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fweb.mit.edu%2F~stevenj%2Fwww%2FECMA-376-new-merged.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C6a1b1f5adf6f41d8436e08d65f8b7a2b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636801449991622984&sdata=81Pd2pBb17YbVkTuhOwVtRz496uHzBLagE8VBeZcCtc%3D&reserved=0> even if it's not the up to date version) full of XML for just stating the we use Zip? Laurent Le 11 déc. 2018 à 17:39, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com<mailto:lrosenth@adobe.com>> a écrit : I know in the original version of ODF they had their own, but I thought they had moved to OPC since it’s pretty much the same thing (as you said, mostly minor details). At the end of the day, we could probably pick any one of them (except OCF) and be happy with it – assuming the desire for a ZIP-based package. Leonard
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2018 20:56:41 UTC