Re: definition of Web Publication

Are we clear yet on how a WP will be “made available for offline reading?”

If we are not yet clear about that (cf convos about service workers) then
does it make sense to bake this into the (minimum viable) definition of a
WP?









On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 2:08 AM, AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>
wrote:

> Ok, this is much more simple.
>
> Notion of creator/author could be found in the « logical work » and the
> idea of « boundaries »  in « primary/secondary » resources.
>
> But, the loss of « offline » in that tiny definition is a question for me.
> It may be optional for WP but IMO, the possibility to make it available
> offline is a must and that's a difference from a website.
>
> Could we add something like:
> The Web Publication is uniquely identifiable and presentable using Open
> Web Platform technologies* and can be made available for offline reading*.
>
> Luc
>
>
> De : Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com>
> Date : jeudi 27 juillet 2017 à 23:44
> À : 'Leonard Rosenthol' <lrosenth@adobe.com>, 'Garth Conboy' <
> garth@google.com>, Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>
> Cc : 'W3C Publishing Working Group' <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
> Objet : RE: definition of Web Publication
> Renvoyer - De : <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
> Renvoyer - Date : jeudi 27 juillet 2017 à 23:45
>
> > we shouldn’t need ot define UA, as that is already defined in HTML
>
>
>
> Yes, I wasn't sure about that. I brought it over from the DPIG note and
> adapted the referenced WAI entry as it seemed important in that document,
> but I think we can take for granted that the thing processing a WP is its
> user agent.
>
>
>
> I'll take it out and we can always revisit later if there's a pressing
> need.
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> *From:* Leonard Rosenthol [mailto:lrosenth@adobe.com <lrosenth@adobe.com>]
>
> *Sent:* July 27, 2017 5:02 PM
> *To:* Garth Conboy <garth@google.com>; Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com>; W3C Publishing Working Group
> <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: definition of Web Publication
>
>
>
> Thanks Matt – much better.  +1 from me on the new definition.
>
>
>
> One minor note – we shouldn’t need ot define UA, as that is already
> defined in HTML (etc.).  Maybe just reference that one…
>
>
>
> *From: *Garth Conboy <garth@google.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 4:21 PM
> *To: *Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>
> *Cc: *Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com>, W3C Publishing Working Group
> <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
> *Subject: *Re: definition of Web Publication
> *Resent-From: *<public-publ-wg@w3.org>
> *Resent-Date: *Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 4:21 PM
>
>
>
> Yep, SGTM too.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>    Garth
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Sorry, link is: https://w3c.github.io/wpub/#terminology
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fwpub%2F%23terminology&data=02%7C01%7C%7C20be4d05253341e5f36108d4d52d06fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636367836747664301&sdata=Z0duCR995ZNUJB6kEc3c72YjXFhL65LXr6x9CqgdL7c%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
>
>
> I'm OK with that definition.
>
>
>
> Dave
>
>
>



-- 
--
Hugh McGuire
https://rebus.community
+1.514.464.2047