W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publ-wg@w3.org > August 2017

Re: Identifying a book on the Web today

From: MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 22:00:39 +0900
Message-ID: <CALvn5EDHqUsjYR6=Ee96M41w9QJBo1FCJSEap=prNVgg_HN=qA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>
Cc: W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
Laurent,

I am responding one of your comments.

I thought that we agreed to tackle the WP spec and then the PWP spec, but
I did not think that we are going to ignore PWP during the design of WP.
My
interpretation may well be incorrect.  But I think that finishing WP
without
considering PWP will lead to the separation of the Web world and the EPUB
world.

Regards,
Makoto

2017-08-04 19:42 GMT+09:00 Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>:

> Dear Makoto,
>
> From my remote island, I will have three comments:
> - The title of this thread (Identifying a book on the Web today) and the
> issue of URLs for resources embedded in a PWP are not related, which makes
> following threads (and searching in threads in the future) rather hard.
> - we agreed to tackle issues with PWPs after WPs are clear. Your issue
> definitely seems to be related with PWPs.
> - I still don't see why *all* discussions have moved from github to
> emails. The expected split btw generic and specific discussions, envisaged
> by Tzviya initially if I recall well, does not work in practice IMHO.
>
> Best,
> Laurent
>
>
>
> Le 4 août 2017 à 12:05, MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp> a écrit :
>
>
>
> 2017-08-04 18:37 GMT+09:00 Hadrien Gardeur <hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com>
> :
>
>> For PWP the situation is a little bit more complex because the package
>>> may be 'elsewhere', ie, not on the Web but, if we regard (which I think is
>>> the case) a PWP some sort of a frozen version of a WP through some
>>> packaging, then the internal structure of a PWP would 100% reflect its
>>> 'exploded' WP ancestry.
>>>
>>> Bottom line: I do not see the problem. But that may only be me.
>>>
>>
>> For a PWP that has a WP ancestry, this is fairly easy to handle and we
>> can simply references all resources using their URL, no matter the context
>> (packaged or not).
>> For PWP with no prior WP ancestry, this might be more difficult, but I
>> don't think that this is an issue that needs to be addressed now.
>>
>
> I do not think so.  I think that this issue is extremely important for
> the unification of EPUB and the Web.  To me, details of manifests
> are much less important.
>
> Regards,
> Makoto
>
>
>


-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto
Received on Friday, 4 August 2017 13:01:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:49:06 UTC