- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:51:13 -0400
- To: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Mar 18, 2013, at 6:19 AM, Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > > On 17/03/2013 11:50, Paul Groth wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm interested in what you think of the current status prov-overview >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-overview/ >> >> Are there any additions, clarifications, etc that you'd like? >> >> Please let me know, I'd like to do a pass in about two weeks. >> >> Thanks >> Paul >> > Hi Paul, looks good. > > Some off-the-cuff notes: > > Section 1 diagram looks good, but it seems a little odd to me that PROV-N is in there with PROV-DFM and constraints rather than shown beside the serializations. I understand that PROV-N is used by PROV-DM, but at this 50,000-foot level I think it might more usefully be shown as "justy another" serialization. > > Technically, PROV-O isn't itself a serialization, but a vocabulary that can be serialized as RDF. But maybe it's best to leave that as is, or things get complicated. Although Graham is accurate, I think that the current portrayal is appropriate for the intent of the overview. -Tim > > The statement "At its core is a conceptual data model, which defines a common vocabulary used to describe provenance" seems to be slightly at odds with the classification of PROV-0DM as being for "advanced" users. > > #g > -- > > >
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 15:51:30 UTC