Re: Proposed response to PROV-AQ comments from James Anderson

Graham,

http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-aq-20120619/ incorrectly stated "This 
document is intended to become a W3C Recommendation. ".

A clarification should be part of our response.

Luc


On 03/11/2013 11:53 AM, Graham Klyne wrote:
>
> I don't know why you think "the document suggests that it is intended 
> to become a recommendation".  This document has always been targeted 
> as being just a note, and I had thought it makes that intent quite 
> clear.  We've used specification language in places to try and make 
> things clear for implementers, but I'm not aware of any claim that the 
> document is intended to have recommendation status.

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm

Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 12:06:50 UTC