W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2013

PROV-AQ issues pending review

From: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:35:08 +0000
Message-ID: <513DB35C.9010007@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
To: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
All,

Following agreement at last Thursday's teleconference, I've closed the 
previously "PENDINGREVIEW" issues of PROV-AQ, all dating back to last year.

I've moved the issues listed below to "PENDINGREVIEW" status.  These are all 
issues which I believe have been addressed in the latest document, or are 
editorial issues to which I've made a reasonable response, or are more 
substantive issues for which I believe the document currently reflects previous 
WG agreement.  I propose to follow a "lazy consensus" protocol for these, and 
close them if I don't hear explicit objections before the next teleconference on 
Thursday, 14-Mar.

There are three outstanding OPEN issues for which I'll seek explicit consensus 
in subsequent messages.

#g
--


PROV-AQ issues pending review, to be closed unless I hear explicit objections by 
Thursday, 14-Mar-2013:

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/414
must-may-paq
PENDING REVIEW
Check usage of MUST & MAY in the paq
2012-06-20
Accessing and Querying Provenance

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/425
service-description-rdf
PENDING REVIEW
Why does the service description need to be rdf?
2012-06-20
Accessing and Querying Provenance

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/600
prov-pingback
PENDING REVIEW
Add simple provenance pingback header spec to PROV-AQ
2012-11-20
Accessing and Querying Provenance

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/609
sparql-endpoint-uri
PENDING REVIEW
Specify how to locate a SPARQL endpoint for querying provenance
2012-11-29
Accessing and Querying Provenance

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/622
json-ld-service-description
PENDING REVIEW
Should PROV-AQ bless use of JSON-LD for service description?
2013-01-31
Accessing and Querying Provenance

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/624
URI-specified-or-REST
PENDING REVIEW
Should PROV-AQ specify PROV service URI or always use template?
2013-02-07
Accessing and Querying Provenance

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/628
prov-anchor-inconsistency
PENDING REVIEW
Specification of anchor in HTML/RDF vs HTTP is inconsistent
2013-02-21
Accessing and Querying Provenance
Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 10:35:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 11 March 2013 10:35:36 GMT