Re: Adding GRDDL to FAQ

Thanks, Graham!

Tim

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 21, 2013, at 6:04, Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote:

> On 13/02/2013 19:00, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>> Thanks. FWIW, you can run that transform and get _something_ out; it's not complete [yet]. Quick PAQ question: what RDF should I sneak into my comments to point to some random PROV-O document about that script? <> prov:hasProvenance <my.ttl> ?
> I'm not tracking this discussion, but that seems reasonable to me (assuming the active base URI is the current document).
> 
> #g
> --
> 
>>> Paul
>>> 
>>> On Feb 13, 2013, at 17:23, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> prov-wg,
>>>> 
>>>> I added a quick note about using GRDDL with PROV-XML at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/PROV-FAQ#Can_PROV-XML_use_GRDDL.3F
>>>> 
>>>> Comments and feedback welcome.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Tim
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 12:58:22 UTC