Re: Adding GRDDL to FAQ

Paul,

On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote:

> Oh that's neat.

Thanks.
FWIW, you can run that transform and get _something_ out; it's not complete [yet].

Quick PAQ question: what RDF should I sneak into my comments to point to some random PROV-O document about that script?

<> prov:hasProvenance <my.ttl> ?


> I wonder if your suggestion of providing a default translation would be helpful.

Sure would. I'm hoping that we can do that in the same way that we maintain the actual ontology (in /ns and not /tr).
Then, we can keep refining it after the WG ends?

-Tim

> 
> Paul
> 
> On Feb 13, 2013, at 17:23, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
> 
>> prov-wg,
>> 
>> I added a quick note about using GRDDL with PROV-XML at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/PROV-FAQ#Can_PROV-XML_use_GRDDL.3F
>> 
>> Comments and feedback welcome.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>