- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:32:24 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
On 11/02/2013 13:48, Timothy Lebo wrote: > Yes, I'm against making the URI-template the definitive way to describe a service. > But I don't have any more energy on this front. It's just a note, and I'll follow semweb practices in my applications. I'll take this as at the level of -0 to specify the URI via the template. That certainly wouldn't prevent you from following best practices in your apps, whatever that may be. #g --
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2013 15:13:03 UTC