- From: Stephan Zednik <zednis2@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:40:28 -0600
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Added Identifier Conventions section to editors draft. changeset: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/f99a7ea128c1 --Stephan On Apr 16, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-665: PROV Identifier conventions clarification [XML Serialization] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/665 > > Raised by: Stephan Zednik > On product: XML Serialization > >> From Luc's feedback on PROV-XML WG Note: > > As part of the design section, we should talk about the identifier > conventions, especially, that they go beyond what XML does usually. > > 1. All PROV identifiers are expressed as QNames in prov-xml. > > 2. PROV mandates that QNames should be mappable to a uri by concatenating > namespace uri to local name. > > 3. Note the restrictive nature of QNames, and some PROV-N identifiers, > such as ex:001 are not valid QNames. Hence, from an inter-operability > viewpoint across representations, implementers should aim to express identifiers > as valid QNames rather than more permissive QualifiedNames in PROV-N. > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 06:40:53 UTC