Re: PROV-Overview review

Hi Daniel,

Thanks for these. All your changes have been included.

Thanks
Paul


On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Daniel Garijo <
dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es> wrote:

>  Hi Paul, Luc.
>  Below is my review of PROV Overview.
> In general it's just a couple of editorial changes and a few typos.
> Nice work!
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
> Document reviewed (latest working draft):
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/overview/prov-overview.html
> On 04-16-2013.
>
> PROV family of Documents
>     Dublic Core -> Dublin Core.
>     bundles . [PROV-LINKS] -> bundles. [PROV-LINKS]
>
> Introduction
>     I think the figure should have a title. Something like: Figure 1:
> organization of PROV.
>
>     The different modules could be mentioned when explaining the figure.
> That would make it easier to follow.
>     Suggestion:
>     "Below is the organization of PROV. At its core is a conceptual data
> model, which defines a common vocabulary
>     used to describe provenance. This is instantiated by various
> serializations. These serializations are used by
>     implementations to interchange provenance. To help developers and
> users express valid provenance, a set of
>     constraints are defined, which can be used to implement provenance
> validators. Finally, to further support the
>     interchange of provenance, additional specifications are provided for
> protocols to locate and access provenance,
>     connect sets of provenance descriptions, and define how to
> interoperate with the widely used Dublin Core vocabulary."
>     -->
>     "Below is the organization of PROV. At its core is a conceptual data
> model (PROV-DM), which defines a common vocabulary
>     used to describe provenance. This is instantiated by various
> serializations (PROV-O, PROV-N, PROV-XML, etc). These serializations are
> used by
>     implementations to interchange provenance. To help developers and
> users express valid provenance, a set of
>     constraints are defined (PROV-CONSTRAINTS), which can be used to
> implement provenance validators. Finally, to further support the
>     interchange of provenance, additional specifications are provided for
> protocols to locate and access provenance (PROV-AQ),
>     connect sets of provenance descriptions (PROV-LINKS), and define how
> to interoperate with the widely used Dublin Core vocabulary (PROV-DC)."
>
>     Note that no reference to prov-dictionary or prov sem can be found in
> the description.
>
> Document Roadmap
>     Typo in Table, row 11: "...across bundles of provenance description."
> --> "across bundles of provenance descriptions."
>
> Namespace
>     "...within the namespace http://www.http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#" ->
> namespace should be http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
>
> Additional information
>     All links point to the release of April 30 except for the PROV
> implementation report:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-prov-implementations-20130312/
>
> Acknowledgements: Could you please change my institution to Daniel Garijo
> (Ontology Engineering Group, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid)?
>
>


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
- Web & Media Group | Department of Computer Science
- The Network Institute
VU University Amsterdam