W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-497: prov-dm: Data Model Figure 1 [prov-dm]

From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:04:06 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|fe4962b1a20896b1446f33890cf6a8b3o8OF4708l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|5061B9D6.20401@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org

Hi all,

I am seeking the group's view on this issue.

Figure 1 http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#prov-core-structures uses labels 
"WasGeneratedBy, ...
for edges (corresponding to prov:wasGeneratedBy in prov-o or 
wasGeneratedBy in prov-n).

Table 2 http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#overview-types-and-relations maps 
concepts Generation, ...
to names.

The reviewer suggest that concepts names are put next to relation names 
in Figure 1.

I fear this may clutter the diagram.  However, if the group is happy 
with this, I will implement it.

Can you express your views?

Regards,
Luc

On 10/09/2012 09:30, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-497: prov-dm: Data Model Figure 1 [prov-dm]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/497
>
> Raised by: Luc Moreau
> On product: prov-dm
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/LC_Feedback#Data_Model_Figure_1
>
> ISSUE-463
>
> Since the following sections are organized by "PROV concept" (e.g., Generation), it would help the reader if those terms were included in the relationship labels along with the names (e.g., wasGeneratedBy).
>
>
>
>
>    

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 14:07:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 25 September 2012 14:08:03 GMT