W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: updates to implementation questionnaire

From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:21:47 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|d7d2618abf4fe2bc0c057faf3326926do8BFLo08l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|50509A7B.9080607@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org

Hi Stephan,

Thanks for drafting the questionnaire.

There is some admin info that needs to be entered by hand. But a lot of 
the rest could
be produced automatically by uploading provenance traces that can be 
consumed or
produced by an implementation.

Is this feasible?


On 09/10/2012 09:25 PM, Stephan Zednik wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2012, at 10:33 AM, Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu> wrote:
>> Thanks for the feedback Eric.
>> On Sep 6, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Stephan,
>>> The first page of the survey looks straight forward, easy to read and
>>> user friendly.
>>> The second page is a bit daunting (but understandable) it might take a
>>> bit more work but at some point it might be nice to categorize
>>> different chunks of  the vocabulary (e.g. core vocabulary), and I
>>> noticed if entire second page remained blank the survey was still
>>> accepted.  It seems as through a warning letting user know about this
>>> might be a good thing.
>> The survey contains 3 possible second pages, determined by whether you select the implementation  type as a language api / application / service (branch 1), a vocabulary extension (branch 2), or a constraints validator implementation (branch 3).  The survey is complete after you fill out the 2nd page so you will only see one of the 3 possible branches on any traversal of the survey.
>> Do you remember which second page option you looked at?
>> Also, the branching nature of the 2nd page is why the survey questions were not required.  I was not sure if making a question required in a branch the user did not see would make the survey un-submittable.  I will look into setting questions on the branching 2nd pages as required.
> I was able to update the survey so that questions about coverage of terms in the branches are required.  I tested the form and it is still submittable even though required questions are on untraversed branches.
>>> One final note, would it be possible to send an email back to survey
>>> author just so they can get a confirmation of their responses and you
>>> can validate their email address?
>> Good idea.  I will look into this.
> I looked into both sending an email to the survey owner (myself) as well as the person that filled out the survey.  I was able to get the former to work but not the later.
> For the survey taker I updated the form submit confirmation page to show a summary of user selections.
> Regarding notifications to survey owner/editor, I was able to set a notification rule so that I as an editor get a digest email of any submissions to the form.  It is up to each editor of the form/spreadsheet to setup their own notifications.
>  From the spreadsheet view, select Tools->Notification Rules.
> --Stephan
>> --Stephan
>>> Cheers,
>>> Eric
>>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu> wrote:
>>>> I have made updates to the implementation questionnaire. The questionnaire
>>>> is now multi-page with the second page loading based on the implementation
>>>> type (language or constraints implementation or vocabulary extension).
>>>> Also, I added a section for coverage of constraints from constraint
>>>> validator implementations.
>>>> The published form is viewable at
>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dGM4cXZYMk0xaFBDT2VyRV92YkY5WkE6MQ
>>>> The source spreadsheet is available at
>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aon9DSj-WtGqdGM4cXZYMk0xaFBDT2VyRV92YkY5WkE#gid=0
>>>> Please take a run through the form and send feedback/suggestions.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> --Stephan

Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2012 14:22:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:18 UTC