W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-503: Data Model Section 2.2.1.2 [prov-dm]

From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:47:56 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|8846809bacbbb9c1a4dba522f4a7eb78o89Am008l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|504DB74C.1040808@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi all,

Here is a suggested response:

The expanded relationship wasAssociatedWith allows for plan to be 
specified (plan attribute 
http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#association.plan). Hence, there is no need 
for a separate wasAdoptedBy relation.

Suggested change:

Replace:
To illustrate expanded relations, we consider the concept of 
association, described in Section 2.1.3.
By:

To illustrate expanded relations, we revisit the concept of association, 
introduced in Section 2.1.3 (full definition of the expanded association 
can be found in section 5.3.3).

Thoughts, comments?

Luc


On 09/10/2012 09:35 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-503: Data Model Section 2.2.1.2   [prov-dm]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/503
>
> Raised by: Luc Moreau
> On product: prov-dm
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/LC_Feedback#Data_Model_Section_2.2.1.2
>
> ISSUE-463
>
> "Agents may adopt plans". Since plans are entities and agents are related to entities through attribution, it follows that "wasAdoptedBy" is an expanded relation specified by PROV. This relation is missing from the spec.
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 10 September 2012 09:48:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 10 September 2012 09:48:30 GMT