W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-525: Data Model Section 5.5.1 [prov-dm]

From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:10:48 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|e728a54e452c453135de729be0a8d52co89AAo08l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|504DAE98.7050102@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org

Hi all,

In response, I would suggest the following response:

To keep things simple, the Working Group voted that alternateOf and 
specializationOf should be binary relations, for which the qualified 
pattern does not apply. So, alternateOf and specializationOf are not
subrelations of wasInfluencedBy, and therefore do not have an ID and a 
list of attributes.


Change to the text: none.

Thoughts, comments?

Luc



On 09/10/2012 09:50 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-525: Data Model Section 5.5.1   [prov-dm]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/525
>
> Raised by: Luc Moreau
> On product: prov-dm
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/LC_Feedback#Data_Model_Section_5.5.1
>
> ISSUE-463
>
> Through the definition of Influence (figure 8), the relationship "specializationOf" should require an ID and support an optional list of attributes.
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 10 September 2012 09:11:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 10 September 2012 09:11:19 GMT