W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: updates to implementation questionnaire

From: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 12:33:00 -0400
Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6C30D8C4-8838-4B39-93AB-A3A9533B1A87@rpi.edu>
To: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
Thanks for the feedback Eric.

On Sep 6, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com> wrote:

> Stephan,
> The first page of the survey looks straight forward, easy to read and
> user friendly.
> The second page is a bit daunting (but understandable) it might take a
> bit more work but at some point it might be nice to categorize
> different chunks of  the vocabulary (e.g. core vocabulary), and I
> noticed if entire second page remained blank the survey was still
> accepted.  It seems as through a warning letting user know about this
> might be a good thing.

The survey contains 3 possible second pages, determined by whether you select the implementation  type as a language api / application / service (branch 1), a vocabulary extension (branch 2), or a constraints validator implementation (branch 3).  The survey is complete after you fill out the 2nd page so you will only see one of the 3 possible branches on any traversal of the survey.

Do you remember which second page option you looked at?

Also, the branching nature of the 2nd page is why the survey questions were not required.  I was not sure if making a question required in a branch the user did not see would make the survey un-submittable.  I will look into setting questions on the branching 2nd pages as required.

> One final note, would it be possible to send an email back to survey
> author just so they can get a confirmation of their responses and you
> can validate their email address?

Good idea.  I will look into this.


> Cheers,
> Eric
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu> wrote:
>> I have made updates to the implementation questionnaire. The questionnaire
>> is now multi-page with the second page loading based on the implementation
>> type (language or constraints implementation or vocabulary extension).
>> Also, I added a section for coverage of constraints from constraint
>> validator implementations.
>> The published form is viewable at
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dGM4cXZYMk0xaFBDT2VyRV92YkY5WkE6MQ
>> The source spreadsheet is available at
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aon9DSj-WtGqdGM4cXZYMk0xaFBDT2VyRV92YkY5WkE#gid=0
>> Please take a run through the form and send feedback/suggestions.
>> Thanks,
>> --Stephan
Received on Friday, 7 September 2012 16:33:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:18 UTC