W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm]

From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:46:21 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|3321ce0e69a63777ef1de757c7307249o83DkN08l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|5045F81D.10105@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
CC: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Hi all,
This is issue is now closed.
Luc

On 08/06/12 16:12, Timothy Lebo wrote:
> Added invalidation to hadRole's domain to suit.
>
> -Tim
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/44c3160e38d7
>
>
> On Jun 8, 2012, at 11:02 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Following yesterday's discussion on roles,  I made the following changes
>> to prov-dm [1] .
>>
>> 1. Definition: A role is the function of an entity or agent with respect to an activity, in the context of a usage, generation, invalidation, association, start, and end.
>>
>> 2. Now roles are permitted in: Usage, Generation, Invalidation, Association, Start, and End
>>
>> 3. Removed example of role in attribution, replaced it by type
>>
>> I am closing this issue pending review.
>>
>> Luc
>>
>> [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/971bd0a3c287
>>
>>
>> On 05/24/2012 10:14 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>>> PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm]
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/384
>>>
>>> Raised by: Luc Moreau
>>> On product: prov-dm
>>>
>>>
>>> In the example,
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#anexample-attribution,
>>> we write:
>>> wasAttributedTo(tr:WD-prov-dm-20111215, ex:Paolo, [prov:role="editor"])
>>>
>>>
>>> But in
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#term-attribute-role
>>> we say:
>>> The attribute prov:role denotes the function of an entity with respect to an activity, in the context of a usage, generation, association, start, and end.
>>>
>>>
>>> So,
>>> 1. Do we want to accept prov:role in Attribution?
>>>    (or, it's not a prov:role but prov:type we should use?)
>>>
>>> 2. If yes, does it mean the definition of prov:role needs to be changed?  where is the activity?
>>>
>>> 3. Should we have an optional activity in Attribution?
>>>
>>> Luc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    
>> -- 
>> Professor Luc Moreau
>> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
>> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
>> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>>
>>
>>

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 12:47:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 4 September 2012 12:47:16 GMT