W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-459 (prov-constraints-lc-review): PROV-CONSTRAINTS review [prov-dm-constraints]

From: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 12:57:43 +0100
Message-Id: <4EB12C7B-FCD9-401F-A6BC-28FD8C3E28DC@inf.ed.ac.uk>
To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hearing no objections, this issue is now closed.  Remaining editorial concerns about PROV-CONSTRAINTS should be discussed in ISSUE-490.

--James

On Aug 30, 2012, at 7:21 PM, James Cheney wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Hope your vacations from PROV went well...
> 
> PROV-CONSTRAINTS has been revised as planned, and I have gone through the comments to ensure that we've addressed all remaining substantive issues.
> 
> - We made the appendix non-normative.  I still need to write up the proof.
> - Hopefully the new "Validation process overview" addresses various questions about what definitions, inferences, constraints mean and how everything fits together.
> 
> I have created ISSUE-490:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/490
> 
> to collect the remaining editorial things (figures, naming consistency) that need to be done, pre LC.
> 
> Are there any objections to closing the issue?
> 
> --James
> 
> 
> On Aug 14, 2012, at 5:10 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote:
> 
>> prov-c crew,
>> 
>> Thanks for considering my comments.
>> 
>> I have reviewed your responses at:
>> 
>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/comments/issue-459-tim.txt
>> 
>> and raised only one ISSUE-459 to survive beyond this current one:
>> 
>> https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/478
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>> 
>> p.s. there are a few remaining points in http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/comments/issue-459-tim.txt 
>> that I hope will be addressed in the post-LC future.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 9, 2012, at 5:59 AM, James Cheney wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> We have gone over PROV-CONSTRAINTS and addressed the points raised in review.  Some points have been made into issues; the remaining open ones are:
>>> 
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/465
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/467
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/468
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/452
>>> 
>>> Reviewers, and anyone else interested, please check the review responses and the current document.
>>> 
>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/comments/issue-459-paul.txt
>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/comments/issue-459-simon.txt
>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/comments/issue-459-stian.txt
>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/comments/issue-459-tim.txt
>>> 
>>> If there are any concerns raised in review that have not been addressed satisfactorily and do not already have an issue, please create a new issue as this one will be closed after today's meeting.
>>> 
>>> --James
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
> 
> 
> 


-- 
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 11:58:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 4 September 2012 11:58:07 GMT