- From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 16:42:16 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Stian, Table updated. Can you check it? Luc On 03/09/12 14:10, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue > Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >> 3. Stian's concern about the summary table and figures. >> 3. Stian's concern about the summary table: >> >> > >> > 2.3 Summary of constraints.. >> > >> > >> > This table is utterly confusing to me as it is not a summary, it does >> > not tell me anything, and I don't understand the columns. (Not helped >> > by the lack of colours and borders on a print out!) > This has not yet been addressed. If I use Chrome, and I print to PDF, > then I get a very confusing table without any borders: > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/7fbsh0pdl95vjds/table2-strange.png > > This can be partially worked around with by adding borders in the > print style sheet. > > >> > I can see it is useful to have a kind of index of all the constraints, >> > but the table needs some work to be understandable. In the web version >> > it is kind-of OK, since the constraints have human readable names - >> > but is there a reason to keep the third column rather than simple >> > horisontal headers? Perhaps even the Type/Relation column could be >> > done as headers? > So my suggestion is to make Table 2 like this: > > <table> > <tr><th colspan="2"><h3>Component 1: Bits and bops</h3></th><tr> > <tr><td rowspan="3">Entity</td> <td>wasGeneratedBy-is-important</td> </tr> > <tr> > <td>used-is-important</td> </tr> > <tr> > <td>everything-is-important</td> </tr> > <tr><td rowspan="3">Activity</td> <td>wasStartedBy-is-important</td> </tr> > <!-- ... --> > <tr><th colspan="2"><h3>Component 2: Lots of stuff</h3></th><tr> > <!-- ... --> > </table> > > > > By removing the third column and making the components appear as > inline headers, the table should become much more manageable, > specially as it fills across multiple screens/pages. > > > > > Component 4 (Bundles) and 6 (Collections) don't have anything listed. > Constraint 58 (membership-empty-collection) should be under 6. > > Component 4 could have something like "No specific constraints; see > section 6.2 Bundles and Documents" > > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 3 September 2012 15:43:18 UTC