W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole)

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:55:40 -0400
Cc: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>, "<public-prov-wg@w3.org>" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <FFAF5711-C327-445A-9F6B-E1ADEBBCF5D7@rpi.edu>
To: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>

On Oct 19, 2012, at 11:32 AM, Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu> wrote:

> Looking at the domain of hadRole again, I believe what we have right now is the result of the RL++ compromise.  The current domain in DL would be the intersection of prov:Influence and the union of prov:Association and prov:InstantaneousEvent, which equates to just the union of prov:Association and prov:InstantaneousEvent.  In RL, the union is ignored so the domain would be recognized as prov:Influence.  There was no way to get the domain aligned with the DM under RL, so adding Influence was a fallback, otherwise the domain would be unspecified.
> 

+1

-Tim

> That is at least my recollection of why it is as it currently is.
> 
> --Stephan
> 
> On Oct 19, 2012, at 7:49 AM, Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es> wrote:
> 
>> Prov-o team:
>> there seems to be a bug in the ontology, which Luc highlighted in the last telecon:
>> 
>> prov:Influence is listed as domain of prov:hadRole, and this is not compatible
>> with PROV-DM. I have checked the latest documents and the only changes to do are:
>> Remove prov:Inflluence from the domain of prov:hadRole in the ontology.
>> Remove prov:Influence from the domain of prov:hadRole in the Overview.html document.
>> Remove prov:hadRole in the "described with properties" box in Overview.html
>> If nobody disagrees with these changes, I will commit them on Monday.
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Daniel
>> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 18:07:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:20 UTC